It was really interesting to hear how the two “participants” discussed the book. In some cases, they talked about issues I didn’t even raise, or they talked about characters or scenarios the book never mentions. So, Notebook LM apparently hallucinates, if it will support its underlying philosophy? Apparently so.
Despite the factual inaccuracies, the system did nail the Truth of the message, so that’s fine. I just think this is so interesting.
Share this post