You know, it's interesting. I tend to think of technology as one of our masters, because it sets the rules we have to work by, in order to do anything with us. It's non-negotiable. If we don't follow its rules, there's only so much we can do with it. On the other hand, AI opens up a whole world of us getting to set groundrules and collaborate. Remember, the AI models are all trained on vast amounts of human experience, so we're not really dealing only with technology. We're collaborating with humanity, itself. That's pretty cool.
My initial approach to AI was via question & answer. That's how I thought it was supposed to work, and most people I know have a similar view. But your vision of using AI as a brainstorming partner is far more powerful. I'm wondering, since technology has, for the most part, been our servant, doing what we tell it to do, are we reluctant to the idea of it becoming a partner? (I'll pause for a moment of self-reflection :)
You know, it's interesting. I tend to think of technology as one of our masters, because it sets the rules we have to work by, in order to do anything with us. It's non-negotiable. If we don't follow its rules, there's only so much we can do with it. On the other hand, AI opens up a whole world of us getting to set groundrules and collaborate. Remember, the AI models are all trained on vast amounts of human experience, so we're not really dealing only with technology. We're collaborating with humanity, itself. That's pretty cool.
My initial approach to AI was via question & answer. That's how I thought it was supposed to work, and most people I know have a similar view. But your vision of using AI as a brainstorming partner is far more powerful. I'm wondering, since technology has, for the most part, been our servant, doing what we tell it to do, are we reluctant to the idea of it becoming a partner? (I'll pause for a moment of self-reflection :)
Great observation & suggestion!